Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 01:52

Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thank you.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Tariff news isn't good... - Daily Kos
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Musk Denies Ketamine Use Following New York Times Report - Bloomberg.com
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
10 Albums Out This Week You Should Listen to Now - Pitchfork
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
I Discovered I Got Cheated On. But His Story About That Night Isn’t Adding Up. - Slate Magazine
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
When writing a novel, how can a character be developed well, but QUICKLY?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What’s next?
Can you list every album you have ever listened to?
Russia can stop this any time.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.